<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Science and Creation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://psalterstudies.wordpress.com/2008/05/18/science-and-creation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://psalterstudies.wordpress.com/2008/05/18/science-and-creation/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the Psalms and their use by Christians through the ages</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:22:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: B. Hawk</title>
		<link>http://psalterstudies.wordpress.com/2008/05/18/science-and-creation/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>B. Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 18:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psalterstudies.wordpress.com/?p=36#comment-62</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;They are different ways of knowing, as they say. What is evidence to one is not evidence to the other. Both views are taking past each other.&lt;/i&gt;

I fully agree--this is part of the largest problem in theology-evolution discussions.  Truth appears from multiple perspectives, and may be approached from different angles.  This reminds me of Aquinas&#039; methodology of rational conclusions, revelation, and the overlap between both.  I&#039;d love to read this series of posts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>They are different ways of knowing, as they say. What is evidence to one is not evidence to the other. Both views are taking past each other.</i></p>
<p>I fully agree&#8211;this is part of the largest problem in theology-evolution discussions.  Truth appears from multiple perspectives, and may be approached from different angles.  This reminds me of Aquinas&#8217; methodology of rational conclusions, revelation, and the overlap between both.  I&#8217;d love to read this series of posts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicola Griffith</title>
		<link>http://psalterstudies.wordpress.com/2008/05/18/science-and-creation/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicola Griffith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 08:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psalterstudies.wordpress.com/?p=36#comment-61</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll look forward very much to these posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll look forward very much to these posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
