01.31.09

Mind and Soul

Posted in Mystics, Spirituality tagged at 12:03 pm by Michelle

Julian of Norwich

Julian of Norwich

Prayer unites the soul to God. Although the soul is like God in nature, it is often different from Him in condition because of a person’s sin. Prayer then acts as a witness that the soul wills as God wills. It eases the conscience and prepares us for grace. That is why God teaches us to pray — to trust without doubting that we will have grace, for the Lord looks on us in love. God wants nothing more than to make us partners in His good will and work.

Julian of Norwich, Revelations

Julian’s concept that it is our soul which is made in the image of God is a very attractive proposition. It frees us from the problematic concept of God as an old man which directly contrasts with Biblical teaching that God is undefinable, that no man was capable to telling you what God looks like.  Hence, the ten commandments forbids making idols of anything in the heavens, under the earth or in the water under the earth (ie. in God’s exclusive domain).

Julian’s quote makes me think about the relationship between the mind and soul.  The linkage between the mind and soul is complicated but they are, to my mind, clearly distinct. The mind is a product of the brain and a function of the body. It goes through a life cycle of development, growth, and eventual decline. It is subject to disease and damage; the soul is free of such disability. If a person suffers a mind-destroying stroke, we don’t consider their soul to be damaged in any way.

What then is the relationship between the mind and soul? I think that the mind can make an impression on the soul like a stamp on hot wax. The mind does not alter the nature of the soul, but molds its shape. To apply this separation to Julian’s quote then, sins distort the proper shape of the soul. Prayer trains the soul to want what God wants and prepares the soul to experience God’s grace. Prayer molds the soul into a form oriented towards God.

+ + +

Julian quote from: Carmen Acevedo Butcher. (2008). A Little Daily Wisdom: Christian Women Mystics. Paraclete Press.

01.27.09

Attempting to Correct Tradition

Posted in Book of Common Prayer, Franciscans, Roman Catholics tagged at 11:47 pm by Michelle

The way the prayer most commonly known as the Prayer of St Francis became association with St Francis is a good example of how popular tradition is created and how hard it is to break. The Vatican is making it known again this week, that there is no evidence what so ever that this prayer was associated with St Francis of Assisi or the Franciscans. It first appeared anonymously in a French Catholic magazine in 1912. According to the Vatican’s statement this week, Pope Benedict XV had it printed  in 1916 in the midst of World War I as a prayer for peace. It was apparently still printed anonymously at this point.

France and Italy have long been the global centers of Catholic religious merchandise, though France seems to have decreased in the second half of the 20th century.  Holy cards were among the most popular products produced in large quantities and shipped globally. Holy cards were especially popular because they have always been very inexpensive and are easy to use, stuck in a prayer book, bible, or missle. With the ability to print cards rapidly, they were quickly adapted for Catholic funeral cards. Holy cards usually have a color print of a religious painting on one side and text on the reverse. At some point early in the 20th century, the prayer in question was printed on the back of a holy card with a picture of St Francis of Assisi on the other side. They were wildly popular. The most popular saint of the day with one of the most popular prayers, so fitting for two successive generations that had known world-wide war. Recall that World War I was popularly known as the War to End All Wars, and yet it was only followed by an even greater war in World War II. The generation that named the War to End All Wars would have found this peace prayer irresistible, as we still do.

These holy cards were so successful that the common people assumed so strongly that the prayer was written by St Francis that it was eventually assumed to be so. As the prayer originally appeared anonymously there was no real push to correct it. Besides, it felt right. So even though the Franciscans never claimed authorship, it was accepted until its popularity attracted the attention of scholars, who couldn’t find it in the Franciscan canon. Franciscans had known it all along, but it is a nice prayer to be credited to your patron/founder saint, so they didn’t made a fuss to correct it.

Attribution of this prayer to St Francis is an example of popular religious tradition that was generated by the laity and eventually adopted by the upper levels of the Roman Catholic church because they knew they couldn’t change it. Associating the prayer with St Francis, also accelerated its wide acceptance because it gave the prayer a veneer of tradition. Yet breaking the link with St Francis may make it more acceptable to Protestants, who have recognized its iffy attribution for some time. The 1979 Book of Common Prayer reprints it under the title “A prayer attributed to St Francis” and more recently it is often just entitled A Peace Prayer. Somehow the generic peace prayer title is unsatisfying. Ironically, at nearly a century old, it is now old enough to be accepted by most Catholics (and Protestants) as traditional without the Franciscan link. Despite the Vatican’s press release this week, you can bet it will continue to be called the prayer of St. Francis for generations to come.  Perhaps this is just as well, considering that it has been so well integrated into Franciscan spirituality. Perhaps we should just call it a Franciscan Peace prayer.

Modern prayer card from Bridge Building.

Modern prayer card from Bridge Building.

01.25.09

Brendan and the Secret of Kells Trailers

Posted in Irish, Monasticism at 1:36 pm by Michelle

Something fun for those of you interested in the early Irish church. Cross posted from my other blog Heavenfield.

New movie trailers for Brendan and the Secret of Kells. One trailer says it will be out March 6, but I’m not sure which country that is for.

A French trailer of the 2D animation:

For those interested in the process, here is a pencil drawing of a segment:

01.11.09

Queen Mary’s Rosary

Posted in prayer beads at 12:00 pm by Michelle

Queen Marys paternoster and book of hours (or missel)

Queen Mary's rosary and prayerbook

The Mary Stuart society has put up this picture of Queen Mary’s ornate rosary or paternoster and prayerbook book of given to her by Lord Herries during her flight to England. This would date this paternoster and book to about 1568. The rosary appears to be complete. Given that she was confined for most of the time between 1568 and her death, it is likely to be complete and undamaged.

Crucifix from Mary Stuarts rosary

Crucifix from Mary Stuart's rosary

The picture at the top of the page is good enough to examine the full structure of the set. The picture doesn’t zoom well, but it looks like linked beads which would be more sturdy. As a gift for the Queen of Scots and patron (and hope) of Catholics throughout the Britain, expense would not have been an issue. It looks like gold, but it could be bronze or brass. There are five decades of small beads and five large beads. There is no Y-connector found on modern Catholic rosaries and no beads on a drop to the cross. Chris Laning had this crucifix from Mary Stuart’s rosary up on her blog: Paternosters. Its an interesting cross with a mixture of motifs: fleur-de-lis creating the circle of a Celtic cross, vine shapes on the shaft perhaps representing the tree of life, and three pearl drops.

Rosary shown on the Mary Stuart Society webpage prior to showing her grave at Westminster Abbey. It may be the same rosary as shown above.

Rosary shown on the Mary Stuart Society webpage prior to showing her grave at Westminster Abbey. This appears to be a different rosary as its beads are described as being shining red.

I wonder if this would be called a rosary at this point, or still a paternoster?

The prayerbook is difficult to see in fine detail due to the quality of the picture. It appears to be open to an illustration of the garden of Gethsemane, appropriate for Mary who spent years confined waiting for execution.

Bead Spotting

Posted in prayer beads at 9:29 am by Michelle

It seems that I’m on the lookout for prayer beads in paintings these days. Derek at haligwoerc put this picture up this morning I noticed the beads in the right wing right away. He lists this painting as by G. David from 1505. If you click on the picture, it will enlarge in a new window.
baptism_of_jesus-008

It looks like a complete late medieval rosary with white beads (bone ?) and darker gauds (maybe amber?) with a cross. There appears to be 10 beads between the gauds if you consider the cross to be randomly placed. It is rather large in obviously placed in the painting. The woman with the beads is not only the largest figure in her panel, perhaps the largest in the painting. In fact the three patrons, the woman with beads, the man in the left wing, and the richly robed person in the left of the central panel are the largest three people in the painting, larger than Jesus and John. Interesting… the woman with beads is also the only person in the painting holding a book. This makes me wonder who this woman is. The woman behind her is wearing a crown and holding a crown.

Addendum: As I look at the paining again, the smaller woman slightly in front of the woman with the large beads also has a small rosary hanging from her belt as well. It looks like the same style although her aves are darker and the guads stand out more. Note tha the smaller women are also wearing black veils until the two most prominent women. I doubt they are nuns though because some of thier hair is showing in all of them and they appear to have more decorative cuffs on their gowns.

Next page