<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Distilled Prayer Project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://psalterstudies.wordpress.com/distilled-prayer-project/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://psalterstudies.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the Psalms and their use by Christians through the ages</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 00:05:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: +dale</title>
		<link>http://psalterstudies.wordpress.com/distilled-prayer-project/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>+dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 23:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://athirst.wordpress.com/?page_id=4#comment-106</guid>
		<description>first, thank you for your studies; i always find them thought-provocative.

second, it seems that there are these days fewer and fewer users of the entire psalter.  even the new and beautiful &lt;a href=&quot;http://books.google.com/books?id=QvDzBsdghRUC&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;benedictine daily prayer&lt;/a&gt; has an abbreviated psalter, many liturgical psalters leave many of the psalms out, and the book of common prayer 1979 allows entire psalms or difficult parts to be left out.

for those of us who think there is a great advantage to praying the entire psalter, i find your discussion of the perhaps noble history of shorter psalters both fascinating and challenging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>first, thank you for your studies; i always find them thought-provocative.</p>
<p>second, it seems that there are these days fewer and fewer users of the entire psalter.  even the new and beautiful <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=QvDzBsdghRUC" rel="nofollow">benedictine daily prayer</a> has an abbreviated psalter, many liturgical psalters leave many of the psalms out, and the book of common prayer 1979 allows entire psalms or difficult parts to be left out.</p>
<p>for those of us who think there is a great advantage to praying the entire psalter, i find your discussion of the perhaps noble history of shorter psalters both fascinating and challenging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
