The Presiding Bishop, the Most Rev. Dr. Katharine Jefferts Schori, preaches at Christ Episcopal Church in Dearborn, Michigan on October 28, 2007. Here she reminds us that we are all ‘the image of God in an earthen vessel’.
Happy Earth Day! Bishop Katharine gives us a practical sermon for Earth Day 2008. She is preaching from the Chapel of Christ the King at the Episcopal Church Center in New York.
I’ll only add here that my congregation celebrated its 25th anniversary in 2007 of sharing its campus with a Lutheran church. This is not an Episcopal-Lutheran fusion at all. We are two independent congregations that share one campus. We occasionally have a joint celebration for feast days like Good Friday or Ascension, and share a few ministries, but we are otherwise completely separate. It works quite well really. The parishes began sharing space in 1981-2 to give a new Lutheran parish help starting out. I don’t think that anyone then planned on us still sharing space over 25 years later.
I wonder how many in our congregations see our sharing a campus as an act of good stewardship for our Earth? Its clear that its seen as a cost savings arrangement that allows us to support more ministry work, but I think its environmental savings have been overlooked. We have 50% of the carbon footprint that we would have without our partner congregation.
An interview with Bishop Katherine Jefferts Schori on science and creation among other things. This interview was taken during the selection process for Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church in 2006.
The AAAS is the American Association for the Advancement of Science. This the main organization of all scientists in all fields in the United States. They publish the journal Science, considered to be one of the two top science journals in the world, among other things. If any organization speaks for science as a whole in the US, it is the AAAS.
In this clip you will hear from the president of the AAAS, and from Dr. Francis Collins, Director of the Human Genome project, and from two high school teachers from Dover, PA where the last court battle over teaching creationism in science classrooms was held.
A few weeks ago I was asked to do a session of my parish’s Adult Forum on the Episcopal Church’s Catechism of Creation, specifically the Science and Creation section. Unfortunately, I wasn’t able to fit it in with the end of the semester duties and a whole series of other things. I didn’t want to do it if I couldn’t adequately prepare for it because I think its a very important topic. As a biologist, I’ve often dealt with teaching evolution to general studies students and I fully appreciate how important concepts of creation are to people’s fundamental concepts of theology.
It occurred to me that it would be a good topic for a series of blog posts. Maybe I’ll even manage to work out a few better answers for students.
It is difficult to talk about creation from the point of view both science and theology at the same time. The problem is mostly that of methodology. They are different ways of knowing, as they say. What is evidence to one is not evidence to the other. Both views are taking past each other.
A starting point, I think, is to say that the bible was never intended to be a science text book, nor are science text books intended to teach theology. The authors of the bible did not write anything that specifically contradicted observable nature. What they wrote fit their observations. It is hard for us today to strip away all of our observational aids. We must remember that they did not have eye glasses, much less telescopes or microscopes. The bible contains theological truths but is not scientific proof.
While discussing some fundamentals of the discussion, this may be a good place to discuss the terms ‘theory’ and ‘law’. As basic definitions go, a theory is statement that reflects one or more proven hypotheses and a law reflects a theory that has gained wide acceptance. In practice, laws are seldom put forward and different disciples do so at different rates. Science must always stand ready to revise its theories and laws as new evidence becomes available. Biology rarely proposes laws and the one that do exist have the title for historical as much as scientific reasons. Physics, on the other hand, produces and revises laws a higher frequency.
Let me give a example of a fundamental theory and law. We have cell theory that states that cells are the most basic form of life and that all cells come from pre-existing cells. We also have Mendel’s laws that predictably describe how genes are inherited from parent to offspring. Are Mendel’s laws more solid or widely accepted than cell theory? No, in fact, there are more exceptions to Mendel’s laws than to cell theory. Biologists believe that evolutionary theory rises to the level of law whether or not it has ever been declared by a scientific body. Biologists simply very rarely declare laws. I can’t think of any in modern times. Also, while we are discussing theories, please note that the theory of evolution and theory of natural selection are two separate theories. Natural selection is one of the mechanisms of evolution, but not the only mechanism or factor. Modern evolutionary theory, called Neo-Darwinism, is a melding of Darwin’s theories and Mendel’s laws.
I plan on putting up a series of posts on creation, some inspired by the Catechism of Creation, some will be on more general creation topics.
Note: I reserve the right to delete/refuse any comments that are abusive, non-constructive or simply long. I welcome constructive comments but this is not the place to post an essay in the comments section.